Mole45

Taken from:

Well who will be left at Salford Conservatives in May?

Richard posts under Dixgood and then complains when not taken seriously!

Well who will be left at Salford Conservatives in May?
Well today i have heard a second senior councillor will not be standing in May, and if Cllr Lindley as  predicted gets to westminster whats left?

Like
Be the first to like this.
January 7, 201020 Replies
« Previous
Next »
Leave a Reply
Logged in as isitfoggy. Log out?
Comment

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

Iain Lindley on January 8, 2010 at 12:28 am said:
Not true. We only have three Councillors up for re-election and two of them have committed to standing again.

Reply ↓

mole45
on January 8, 2010 at 10:49 am said:
Sorry would i be right in saying that ian will not be standing when he is up,and of course with Christine going i count them both as senior members, If of course you are succesfull it must weaken your group?

Reply ↓
Jennifer Dixgood-Jones on January 8, 2010 at 4:59 pm said:
Hey Iain.

It’s a shame you couldn’t have stood Richard Carvath for your party.

What do you think of my exclusive interview with Richard?

http://dixgoodjones.wordpress.com/2010/01/08/richardcarvath

Any other sexy Salford politicos fancy getting the Dixgood-Jones treatment?

Jen x

Reply ↓

mole45
on January 8, 2010 at 5:56 pm said:
Hi
Jen is this for real?

Reply ↓
Jennifer Dixgood-Jones on January 8, 2010 at 6:12 pm said:
Yeah it’s bona fide and Carvath is cool with it.

Jen x

Reply ↓
Joanne on January 9, 2010 at 2:31 am said:
In case you didn’t know, “Jennifer Dixgood-Jones” is Carvath himself writing under a pseudonym. He’s very fond of using alliterative female pseudonyms (Roxy Redpants, Katie Kay, Hannah Harper…) and there’s no such surname as “Dixgood” (try googling), however it does say “Dick’s good”. (Dick being short for Richard hopefully. Katie Kay and Hannah Harper are female porn stars.)

Reply ↓

mole45
on January 9, 2010 at 1:08 pm said:
Hi
Joanne
This is going right over my head.thanks for letting me know.
Regards

Reply ↓
Roger Berry on January 9, 2010 at 9:46 am said:
To help in understanding Richards problems I’ve copied this and I’m sure that everyone can see who it applies to………

The DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder are: A. A pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, lack of empathy, as indicated by at least five of:
1. a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love 3. believes that he or she is “special” and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement, ie unreasonable expectations of especially favourable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
6. is interpersonally exploitative, ie takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
7. lacks empathy and is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
8. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviours or attitudes

Points 1,2,3,4,5,7,8, 9 could have been written just for Richard!

(Joe someone should be contacting you soon (if they haven’t already about the issue we discussed btw)

Reply ↓
Joanne on January 9, 2010 at 11:06 am said:
I wish he would have done the interview in the form of a YouTube video. He could have dressed up in drag to ask the questions, filmed himself answering them, then edited it together =)

Reply ↓
Richard Carvath on January 9, 2010 at 11:13 am said:
I’m open to the possibility of doing a YouTube video with you Joanne…

Reply ↓
Roger Berry on January 9, 2010 at 1:15 pm said:
Of course you are Richard your that desperate for ANY publicity or attention you’d do an interview with a wheelie bin.

Being Ignored must be killing you and the fact that the Advertiser’s editorial team have a copy of your little comment about just how pleased you are with the publicity you have had from them even the negative stuff might well mean that they will keep that in mind and do the right ting and just ignore you from now on.

Reply ↓
Richard Carvath on January 9, 2010 at 4:36 pm said:
I think that’s rather unkind comparing Joanne to a wheelie bin!

I’m sure she’s quite lovely.

Reply ↓
Roger Berry on January 9, 2010 at 4:39 pm said:
Joanne might well be Richard but some of your latest “Third person” antics are pointing towards you needing urgent psychiatric help

Reply ↓
Richard Carvath on January 9, 2010 at 6:04 pm said:
What you urgently need to do ‘Roger Berry’ is stop being an anonymous twit and come clean about your identity.

Where do you get ridiculous lines like “…needing urgent psychiatric help” from?

‘Noddy’s Guide to Political Activism’ by Enid Blyton?

‘Hatchet Jobs: A Hack’s Guide’ by David Ottewell?

‘The Definitive Political Assassin’s Bible’ by Alastair Campbell?

‘The Art of Political Rhetoric’ by Larry Flynt?

Do me a favour pal and grow up.

Reply ↓
Roger Berry on January 9, 2010 at 6:54 pm said:
Priceless I’m being told to grow up by a man who only real achievement is to have cleaned a few toilets and ovens, has no wife or family, no social responsibility, no work history in the community and now seems to spend an inordinate amount of time inventing people to tell the world how great he is!!

At best your an adolescent and at worst have a number of psychiatric conditions such as the blatantly obvious NPD. You have no authority or personal respect and with the exception of self praise have very rarely if ever been publicly lauded for your work.

You see yourself as some sort of cross between Rocky, The Pope, Brad pitt and Richard The Lionheart, a dashing crusader fared by men and desired by women.

The truth is of course that most people see you as a short ginger cross between Mr Been and Alan Partridge with a touch of that man who wears a billboard and shouts “The End is Neigh Repent you Sinners”

You spit bile at people that don’t fit into your ortholagy and hide behind the bible. I think you’ll find that getting any sort of attention will become harder and harder as more and more places ban and remove you soon, not for being a Christian or a serious candidate but simply because your an obnoxious and tedious irrelevance.

Ps Happy New Year

Reply ↓
Richard Carvath on January 9, 2010 at 9:24 pm said:
You ain’t seen nothin’ yet…
Reply ↓
Roger Berry on January 10, 2010 at 3:48 am said:
Either have you Richard, so far I’ve used a fraction of the resource’s available to me while you ARE pretty much all of yours and you might want to consider that x

Reply ↓
Richard Carvath on January 10, 2010 at 1:28 pm said:
You’re the only one that thinks you are in some sort of contest with me. That’s not how I view you though. I don’t sit up at night worrying about what you’re going to do next! I think you are a tragic ‘head who is obsessed with me but that’s your problem. For over 7 months now you have wasted dozens and dozens of hours of your life on the internet in feverishly watching anything that Google brings up either by me or about me, and in writing the most far fetched defamatory bollocks imaginable about me… and yet you say I’m insignificant, so why do you waste your time doing it?

Reply ↓
Roger Berry on January 10, 2010 at 3:45 pm said:
Now THAT is the first intelligent question I’ve seen from you. But since you’ve accused me of being various people and have stated on a few occasions that you have a picture of me you should know the answer shouldn’t you.

Oh and as for the time issue I’m mostly answering you between other tasks and even being paid for doing so you needn’t worry on my account.

Reply ↓
Roger Berry on January 10, 2010 at 3:51 pm said:
Oh and to clarify , I think your POLITICLY insignificant and irreverent, but socially some of your actions and comments have a wider relevance and as a case study your fairly interesting but not for the reasons you might think.

Reply ↓

Leave a comment